(3) |
President Reagan's Address to the
Nation on Defense and National Security of March 23, 1983
|
Since the dawn of the atomic age, we've sought to reduce the risk of war
by maintaining a strong deterrent and by seeking genuine arms control. "Deterrence"means
simply this: making sure any adversary who thinks about attacking the United
States, or our allies, or our vital interests, concludes that the risks
to him outweigh any potential gains. Once he understands that, he won't
attack. We maintain the peace through our strength; weakness only invites
aggression.
This strategy of deterrence has not changed. It still works. But what it
takes to maintain deterrence has changed. It took one kind of military force
to deter an attack when we had far more nuclear weapons than any other power;
it takes another kind now that the Soviets, for example, have enough accurate
and powerful nuclear weapons to destroy virtually all of our missiles on
the ground. Now, this is not to say that the Soviet Union is planning to
make war on us. Nor do I believe a war is inevitable - quite the contrary.
But what must be recognized is that our security is based on being prepared
to meet all threats.
What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security
did bot rest upon the threat of instant U.S. retaliation to deter a Soviet
attack, that w could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles
before they reached our own soil or that of our allies.
I know this is formidable, technical task, one that may not be accompanied
the end of this century. Yet, current technology has attained a level of
sophistication where it's reasonable for us to begin this effort. It will
take years, probably decades of effort on many fronts. There will be failures
and setbacks, just as there will be successes and breakthroughs. And as
we proceed, we must remain constant in preserving a solid capability for
flexible response. But isn't it worth every investment necessary to free
the world from the threat or nuclear war? We know it is.
Tonight, consistent with our obligations of the ABM treaty and recognizing
the need for closer consultation with our allies, I'm taking an important
first step. I am directing a comprehensive and intensive effort to define
a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate
goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles. This
could pave the way for arms control measures to eliminate the weapons themselves.
We seek neither military superiority nor political advantage. Our only purpose
- one all people share - is to search for ways to reduce the danger of nuclear
war.
|