Facts
In order for a telecommunications satellite to
function effectively, it must be placed into a "geosynchronous orbit." A
geosynchronous orbit is an orbit in which a satellite remains stationary
vis-a-vis a particular location on the earth. This orbit is approximately
22,000 miles above the equator.
Prior to 1981, NASA launched commercial
satellites by NASA's "Delta" rocket, a three-stage, expendable launch vehicle
which could lift a satellite into a geosynchronous orbit. Each Delta carried
only one satellite. In the 1970s, NASA decided to phase out expendable rockets
and to launch all satellites from the Space Shuttle. The Space Shuttle could
carry up to four satellites at a time but was not designed to reach the
geosynchronous orbit. Instead, the Space Shuttle orbited at an altitude of
150-160 nautical miles (a "parking orbit"). To launch satellites from the Space
Shuttle's parking orbit into higher orbits, each satellite needed its own upper
stage rocket.
In 1976, McDonnell Douglas proposed to develop
such an upper stage rocket for satellites, at its own expense, if NASA agreed
not to fund development of a competing system. NASA agreed but did not obligate
itself to purchase any hardware from McDonald Douglas nor promise not to
purchase similar hardware or services from other companies. NASA also retained
the right to set a ceiling on the price McDonnell Douglas could charge for the
upper stage rocket and related launch services.
McDonald Douglas's upper stage rocket, a power
assist module (PAM), had two key components: (1) airborne support equipment,
consisting principally of a spin table, cradle, sun shield and related control
electronics and hardware designed to hold the satellite in the Space Shuttle's
cargo bay from liftoff to the parking orbit; and (2) a Star 48 motor
manufactured by Morton Thiokol which is attached to a satellite prior to
liftoff. The nozzle or exit cone of the Star 48 motor was manufactured by Hitco
under a subcontract with Morton Thiokol.
Western Union initially contacted both NASA
and Arianespace, a French based company of the European Space Agency to launch
its Westar VI satellite. The Ariane rocket was an expendable launch vehicle
capable of placing a satellite into a geosynchronous orbit without the use of a
PAM.2 In 1981, Western Union entered a contract with Arianespace for
a December 1983 launch on their Ariane rocket. Subsequently Western Union
relinquished its launch reservation with NASA.
Later in 1982, Arianespace had a failure (its
second in six launches). It rescheduled Western Union's launch date which
caused Western Union to reconsider its decision to launch via Arianespace. At
this point, Western Union felt more confidence in the Space Shuttle than
Ariane, believing the Space Shuttle was better priced3 and more reliable.
By April 1983, Western Union had decided to use the Space Shuttle "because of
economic reasons, and the advantages of the new program and the new vehicle
[i.e., the Space Shuttle]."
In December 1982, Western Union began
negotiations with McDonnell Douglas for a PAM for its Westar VI satellite.
Western Union had previously purchased PAMs from McDonnell Douglas for its
Westar IV and Westar V satellites which were launched in 1982. In March 1983,
Western Union signed a contract with McDonnell Douglas. The execution of the
contract was conditioned on later incorporating an inter-party waiver clause
NASA would require of Western Union in a Launch Services Agreement. As part of
the contract between Western Union and McDonnell Douglas, McDonnell Douglas disclaimed
any warranties and Western Union agreed to hold McDonald Douglas harmless for
any loss or damage and to obtain insurance to cover any potential loss.
In January 1984, after having terminated its
agreement with Arianespace, Western Union signed a Launch Services Agreement
with NASA for a launch on the Space Shuttle. Western Union drafted an
inter-party waiver of liability for the McDonnell Douglas contract to comply
with a condition in the NASA Launch Services Agreement and submitted the draft
to McDonnell Douglas for its approval. McDonnell Douglas approved the draft and
the waiver was incorporated, by amendment, into the parties' agreement as
article 14.
On February 3, 1984, the Space Shuttle
Challenger lifted off carrying Westar VI. About eight hours after liftoff,
Westar VI was deployed from the Space Shuttle's cargo bay. The upper stage
rocket, scheduled to burn for 85 seconds to boost Westar VI into an orbit which
would intersect with the geosynchronous orbit, failed when the Star 48 motor's
exit cone, or nozzle, disintegrated about four seconds after ignition.
Thereafter, the motor nozzle assembly was expelled and the motor extinguished
itself. The short burn of the upper stage rocket caused Westar VI to go into a
low elliptical orbit around the earth with a maximum altitude of only 655
nautical miles. In this orbit, Westar VI was useless for telecommunication
purposes.
Western Union made a claim against its
insurance companies for a total loss of the satellite. The insurers paid
Western Union about $105,000,000 million on the claim.
About three weeks after the Space Shuttle
mission, Hughes Aircraft Corporation (which had manufactured Westar VI) briefed
NASA about the possibility of retrieving the satellite. On September 7, 1984,
an agreement was reached by Hughes and the majority insurers of Westar VI to
retrieve the satellite. In November 1984, Westar VI was retrieved from its
improper orbit and brought to Hughes Aircraft Company.
On January 17, 1986, Appalachian filed suit in
the Orange County Superior Court against McDonald Douglas, Morton Thiokol and
Hitco, alleging causes of action for negligence and strict liability. On
February 14, McDonnell Douglas filed for a petition to remove the case to
federal court. Thereafter, on February 18, Appalachian voluntarily dismissed
the federal court action and filed a new complaint, containing minor
modifications, in the Orange County Superior Court. In federal court, McDonnell
Douglas filed a motion to strike or vacate Appalachian's dismissal. The federal
court denied the motion, noting that removal had been improper.
|